热门试卷

X 查看更多试卷
1
题型:简答题
|
单选题


Every spring migrating salmon return to British Columbia’s rivers to spawn. And every spring new reports detail fresh disasters that befall them. This year is no different. The fisheries committee of Canada’s House of Commons and a former chief justice of British Columbia, Bryan Williams, have just examined separately why 1.3 million sockeye salmon mysteriously "disappeared" from the famed Fraser river fishery in 2004.Their conclusions point to a politically explosive conflict between the survival of salmon and the rights of First Nations, as Canadians call Indians.
In 2004, only about 524, 000 salmon are thought to have returned to the spawning grounds, barely more than a quarter the number who made it four years earlier. High water temperatures may have killed many. The House of Commons also lambasted the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for poor scientific data, and for failing to enforce catch levels. Four similar reports since 1992 have called for the department’s reform. In vain: its senior officials are "in denial" about its ’failings, said the committee.
Mr. Williams’ report added a more shocking twist. He concluded that illegal fishing on the Fraser river is "rampant and out of control", with "no go" zones where fisheries officers are told not to confront Indian poachers for fear of violence. The judge complained that the DFO withheld a report by one of its investigators which detailed extensive poaching and sale of salmon by members of the Cheam First Nation, some of whom were armed.
Some First Nations claim an unrestricted right to fish and sell their catch. Canada’s constitution acknowledges the aboriginal right to fish for food and for social and ceremonial needs, but not a general commercial right. On the Fraser, however, the DFO has granted Indians a special commercial fishery. To some Indians, even that is not enough.
Both reports called for more funds for the DFO, to improve data collection and enforcement. They also recommended returning to a single legal regime for commercial fishing applying to all Canadians.
On April 14th, Geoff Regan, the federal fisheries minister, responded to two previous reports from a year ago. One, from a First Nations group, suggested giving natives a rising share of the catch. The other proposed a new quota system for fishing licences, and the conclusion of long-standing talks on treaties, including fishing rights, with First Nations. Mr. Regan said his department would spend this year consulting "stakeholders" (natives, commercial and sport fishermen). It will also launch pilot projects aimed at improving conservation, enforcement and First Nations’ access to fisheries.What does "First Nations" refer to()

A.Canadian Indians.
B.American Indians.
C.Natives of the Fraser.
D.People who inhabiting the Fraser.

正确答案

A

解析

语义题。文章第一段最后一句中提到“…第一民族即加拿大人称之为印第安人的权利”,由此可以判断出First Nations指的就是印第安人,所以[A]“加拿大的印第安人”正确。[B]“美国的印第安人”,[C]“Fraser的本地人”和[D]“居住在Fraser的人”都与文意不符。

1
题型:简答题
|
单选题

根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的规定,下列关于督促程序的表述中,正确的是( )。

A.督促程序是一种非讼的特别程序
B.督促程序适用于债权人请求债务人交付房产的案件
C.支付令的送达可以采用公告送达的方式
D.支付令异议的提出,可以采用口头形式

正确答案

A

解析

本题考查对督促程序的理解。督促程序是一种非讼的特别程序,适用于债权人请求债务人支付金钱、有价证券的案件。支付令的送达应采用直接送达、留置送达等法定送达方式。支付令异议的提出,可以采用书面形式。所以只有A选项正确。

1
题型:简答题
|
单选题


Asia’s real boat-rocker is a growing China, not Japan, a senior American economist observed.
There is so much noise surrounding and emanating from the world’s miracle economy that it is becoming cacophonous. In Washington, D. C., the latest idea is that China is becoming too successful, perhaps even dangerously so: while Capitol Hill resounds with complaints of trade surpluses and currency manipulation, the Pentagon and sundry think-tanks echo to a new drumbeat of analysts worrying about China’s 12.6% annual rise in military spending and about whether it might soon have the ability to take preemptive military action to force Taiwan to rejoin it. So it may be no coincidence that for
three consecutive weekends the streets of big Chinese cities have been filled with the sounds of demonstrators marching and rocks being thrown, all seeking to send a different message: that Japan is the problem in Asia, not China, because of its wanton failure to face up to its history; and that by cosying up to Japan in security matters, America is allying with Asia’s pariah.
Deafness is not the only risk from all this noise. The pressure towards protectionism in Washington is strong, and could put in further danger not only trade with China but also the wider climate for trade liberalisation in the Doha round of the World Trade Organisation (WTO). So far words have been the main weapons used between China and Japan, but there is a chance that nationalism in either or both countries could lead the governments to strike confrontational poses over their territorial disputes in the seas that divide them, even involving their navies. And the more that nationalist positions become entrenched in both countries but especially China, the more that street protests could become stirred up, perhaps towards more violence.
All these issues are complex ones and, as is often the case in trade and in historical disputes, finding solutions is likely to be far from simple. A revaluation of the yuan, as demanded in Congress, would not rebalance trade between America and China, though it might help a little, in due course. A "sincere" apology by Japan for its wartime atrocities might also help a little, but it would not suddenly turn Asia’s natural great-power rivals into bosom buddies. For behind all the noise lies one big fact: that it is the rise of China, not the status or conduct of Japan, that poses Asia’s thorniest questions.The "the world's miracle economy" in the beginning of the second paragraph refers to()

A.Asia's real boat-rocker.
B.China's economic success.
C.Japan's economic success.
D.both China and Japan's economic success.

正确答案

B

解析

推理题。文章一开始就谈到,亚洲真正掌舵的是中国,而不是日本;第二段第二句也提到“…中国正变得太成功”,由此可推知第二段开头的“世界的奇迹经济”指的就是中国的经济成功,所以[B]项正确。[A]“亚洲真正的掌舵者”,[C]“日本的经济成功”和[D]“中国和日本的经济成功”都不是文章所要表达的内容。

1
题型:简答题
|
单选题


Every spring migrating salmon return to British Columbia’s rivers to spawn. And every spring new reports detail fresh disasters that befall them. This year is no different. The fisheries committee of Canada’s House of Commons and a former chief justice of British Columbia, Bryan Williams, have just examined separately why 1.3 million sockeye salmon mysteriously "disappeared" from the famed Fraser river fishery in 2004.Their conclusions point to a politically explosive conflict between the survival of salmon and the rights of First Nations, as Canadians call Indians.
In 2004, only about 524, 000 salmon are thought to have returned to the spawning grounds, barely more than a quarter the number who made it four years earlier. High water temperatures may have killed many. The House of Commons also lambasted the federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) for poor scientific data, and for failing to enforce catch levels. Four similar reports since 1992 have called for the department’s reform. In vain: its senior officials are "in denial" about its ’failings, said the committee.
Mr. Williams’ report added a more shocking twist. He concluded that illegal fishing on the Fraser river is "rampant and out of control", with "no go" zones where fisheries officers are told not to confront Indian poachers for fear of violence. The judge complained that the DFO withheld a report by one of its investigators which detailed extensive poaching and sale of salmon by members of the Cheam First Nation, some of whom were armed.
Some First Nations claim an unrestricted right to fish and sell their catch. Canada’s constitution acknowledges the aboriginal right to fish for food and for social and ceremonial needs, but not a general commercial right. On the Fraser, however, the DFO has granted Indians a special commercial fishery. To some Indians, even that is not enough.
Both reports called for more funds for the DFO, to improve data collection and enforcement. They also recommended returning to a single legal regime for commercial fishing applying to all Canadians.
On April 14th, Geoff Regan, the federal fisheries minister, responded to two previous reports from a year ago. One, from a First Nations group, suggested giving natives a rising share of the catch. The other proposed a new quota system for fishing licences, and the conclusion of long-standing talks on treaties, including fishing rights, with First Nations. Mr. Regan said his department would spend this year consulting "stakeholders" (natives, commercial and sport fishermen). It will also launch pilot projects aimed at improving conservation, enforcement and First Nations’ access to fisheries.Which of the following is NOT the reason for the decrease of salmon according to Mr. Williams()

A.High water temperatures.
B.Shocking twist.
C.Illegal fishing.
D.Officials' failings.

正确答案

B

解析

细节题。文章第二、三段提到水温高、非法捕鱼和官员执法不力都是鲑鱼数量减少的原因,即题目中的[A]、[C]、[D]三项。只有[B]“骇人听闻的歪曲”不是文中提到的原因之一。

1
题型:简答题
|
单选题

根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的规定,下列关于公示催告程序的表述中,正确的是(  )。

A.公示催告期间最短不得少于90日
B.在公示催告期间,转让票据权利的行为无效
C.公示催告案件由票据持有人所在地的基层人民法院管辖
D.公示催告申请人申请人民法院作出除权判决的,应自申报权利期间届满的次日起1年内提出

正确答案

B

解析

公示催告期间最短不得少于60日。公示催告案件由票据支付地的基层人民法院管辖。除权判决自公告之日起生效,当事人不得提起上诉。只有选项B正确。

百度题库 > 高考 > 物理 > 热力学第一定律

扫码查看完整答案与解析

  • 上一题
  • 1/5
  • 下一题