- 波的干涉
- 共480题
被邓小平称之为“马克思主义基本原理和中国社会主义实践相结合的政治经济学”,并把其称做纲领文件的是
A.《关于建国以来党的若干历史问题的决议》
B.《关于经济体制改革的决定》
C.《关于社会主义市场经济若干重大问题的决定》
D.江泽民《在中国共产党第十四次全国代表大会上的报告》
正确答案
B
解析
[解析] 考查对《关于经济体制改革的决定》内容的掌握。1984年党的十二届三中全会经通过的《中共中央关于经济体制改革的决定》,提出社会主义经济是有计划的商品经济,突破了长期以来把计划经济同商品经济对立起来的传统观念。邓小平认为这是“马克思主义基本原理和中国社会主义实践相结合的政治经济学”,并把其称做纲领性文件。1992年,党的十四大确立建立社会主义市场体制的改革目标,从根本上破除了把计划经济和市场经济看做社会制度范畴的思想束缚。所以,B项是正确答案。
It has been a wretched few weeks for America’s celebrity bosses. AIG’s Maurice Greenberg has been dramatically ousted from the firm through which he dominated global insurance for decades. At Morgan Stanley a mutiny is forcing Philip Purcell, a boss used to getting his own way, into an increasingly desperate campaign to save his skin. At Boeing, Harry Stonecipher was called out of retirement to lead the scandal-hit firm and raise ethical standards, only to commit a lapse of his own, being sacked for sending e-mails to a lover who was also an employee. Carly Fiorina was the most powerful woman in corporate America until a few weeks ago, when Hewlett-Packard (HP) sacked her for poor performance. The fate of Bernie Ebbers is much grimmer. The once high-profile boss of WorldCom could well spend the rest of his life behind bars following his conviction last month on fraud charges.
In different ways, each of these examples appears to point to the same, welcome conclusion: that the imbalance in corporate power of the late 1990s, when many bosses were allowed to behave like absolute monarchs, has been corrected. Alas, appearances can be deceptive. While each of these recent tales of chief-executive woe is a sign of progress, none provides much evidence that the crisis in American corporate governance is yet over. In fact, each of these cases is an example of failed, not successful, governance.
At the very least, the boards of both Morgan Stanley and HP were far too slow to address their bosses’ inadequacies. The record of the Boeing board in picking chiefs prone to ethical lapses is too long to be dismissed as mere bad luck. The fall of Messrs Greenberg and Ebbers, meanwhile, highlights the growing role of government--and, in particular, of criminal prosecutors in holding bosses to account: a development that is, at best, a mixed blessing. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, passed in haste following the Enron and WorldCom scandals, is imposing heavy costs on American companies; whether these are exceeded by any benefits is the subject of fierce debate and may not be known for years.
Eliot Spitzer, New York’s attorney-general, is the leading advocate and practitioner of an energetic "law enforcement" approach. He may be right that the recent burst of punitive actions has been good for the economy, even if some of his own decisions have been open to question. Where he is undoubtedly right is in arguing that corporate America has done a lamentable job of governing itself. As he says in an article in the Wall Street Journal this week, "The honour code among CEOs didn’t work. Board oversight didn’t work. Self-regulation was a complete failure." AIG’s board, for example, did nothing about Mr. Greenberg’s use of murky accounting, or the conflicts posed by his use of offshore vehicles, or his constant bullying of his critics let alone the firm’s alleged participation in bid rigging--until Mr. Spitzer threatened a criminal prosecution that might have destroyed the firm.How many America's celebrity bosses are mentioned in the first paragraph()
A.Three.
B.Four.
C.Five.
D.Six.
正确答案
C
解析
细节题。文章第一段提到的大名鼎鼎的美国老板包括:AIG的Maurice Greenberg,摩根斯坦利的Philip Purcell,波音的Harry Stonecipher,惠普的Carly Fiorina和世通的Bernie Ebbers。由此可知正确答案应为[C]“严五位”。其余各项都不符合文章的内容。
各级各类( )是唯一合法的代表企业员工合法权益的社团组织和法人。
A.政府
B.企业管理者
C.工会
D.社团组织
正确答案
C
解析
暂无解析
It has been a wretched few weeks for America’s celebrity bosses. AIG’s Maurice Greenberg has been dramatically ousted from the firm through which he dominated global insurance for decades. At Morgan Stanley a mutiny is forcing Philip Purcell, a boss used to getting his own way, into an increasingly desperate campaign to save his skin. At Boeing, Harry Stonecipher was called out of retirement to lead the scandal-hit firm and raise ethical standards, only to commit a lapse of his own, being sacked for sending e-mails to a lover who was also an employee. Carly Fiorina was the most powerful woman in corporate America until a few weeks ago, when Hewlett-Packard (HP) sacked her for poor performance. The fate of Bernie Ebbers is much grimmer. The once high-profile boss of WorldCom could well spend the rest of his life behind bars following his conviction last month on fraud charges.
In different ways, each of these examples appears to point to the same, welcome conclusion: that the imbalance in corporate power of the late 1990s, when many bosses were allowed to behave like absolute monarchs, has been corrected. Alas, appearances can be deceptive. While each of these recent tales of chief-executive woe is a sign of progress, none provides much evidence that the crisis in American corporate governance is yet over. In fact, each of these cases is an example of failed, not successful, governance.
At the very least, the boards of both Morgan Stanley and HP were far too slow to address their bosses’ inadequacies. The record of the Boeing board in picking chiefs prone to ethical lapses is too long to be dismissed as mere bad luck. The fall of Messrs Greenberg and Ebbers, meanwhile, highlights the growing role of government--and, in particular, of criminal prosecutors in holding bosses to account: a development that is, at best, a mixed blessing. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, passed in haste following the Enron and WorldCom scandals, is imposing heavy costs on American companies; whether these are exceeded by any benefits is the subject of fierce debate and may not be known for years.
Eliot Spitzer, New York’s attorney-general, is the leading advocate and practitioner of an energetic "law enforcement" approach. He may be right that the recent burst of punitive actions has been good for the economy, even if some of his own decisions have been open to question. Where he is undoubtedly right is in arguing that corporate America has done a lamentable job of governing itself. As he says in an article in the Wall Street Journal this week, "The honour code among CEOs didn’t work. Board oversight didn’t work. Self-regulation was a complete failure." AIG’s board, for example, did nothing about Mr. Greenberg’s use of murky accounting, or the conflicts posed by his use of offshore vehicles, or his constant bullying of his critics let alone the firm’s alleged participation in bid rigging--until Mr. Spitzer threatened a criminal prosecution that might have destroyed the firm.What is the author's attitude toward ousting the America's celebrity bosses()
A.Sympathetic.
B.Supportive.
C.Indifferent.
D.Uninterested.
正确答案
B
解析
推理题。文章第二段第一句中提到“这些例子的每一个表现出指向相同且受人欢迎的结论:即20世纪90年代末期很多老板被允许像绝对君主那样行事的公司权力的不平衡已得到了纠正”,同时结合下文的相关内容,可以看出作者对取代那些美国知名老板的做法是持支持态度的,所以[B]“支持的”符合文意。[A]“同情的”,[C]“漠不关心的”和[D]“不感兴趣的”都与作者的态度不符。
社会主义初级阶段基本特征是
A.逐步摆脱不发达状态,基本实现社会现代化的历史阶段
B.由农业国逐步转变为工业化国家的历史阶段
C.逐步实现经济市场化较高的历史阶段
D.实现中华民族伟大复兴的历史阶段
正确答案
A
解析
[解析] 考查对社会主义初级阶段基本特征的确认和掌握。题中的四个备选项都是社会主义初级阶段发展过程的特征,其中A项是基本特征,B、C、D项是社会主义初级阶级基本特征的具体体现,因此,A项是正确选项。
It has been a wretched few weeks for America’s celebrity bosses. AIG’s Maurice Greenberg has been dramatically ousted from the firm through which he dominated global insurance for decades. At Morgan Stanley a mutiny is forcing Philip Purcell, a boss used to getting his own way, into an increasingly desperate campaign to save his skin. At Boeing, Harry Stonecipher was called out of retirement to lead the scandal-hit firm and raise ethical standards, only to commit a lapse of his own, being sacked for sending e-mails to a lover who was also an employee. Carly Fiorina was the most powerful woman in corporate America until a few weeks ago, when Hewlett-Packard (HP) sacked her for poor performance. The fate of Bernie Ebbers is much grimmer. The once high-profile boss of WorldCom could well spend the rest of his life behind bars following his conviction last month on fraud charges.
In different ways, each of these examples appears to point to the same, welcome conclusion: that the imbalance in corporate power of the late 1990s, when many bosses were allowed to behave like absolute monarchs, has been corrected. Alas, appearances can be deceptive. While each of these recent tales of chief-executive woe is a sign of progress, none provides much evidence that the crisis in American corporate governance is yet over. In fact, each of these cases is an example of failed, not successful, governance.
At the very least, the boards of both Morgan Stanley and HP were far too slow to address their bosses’ inadequacies. The record of the Boeing board in picking chiefs prone to ethical lapses is too long to be dismissed as mere bad luck. The fall of Messrs Greenberg and Ebbers, meanwhile, highlights the growing role of government--and, in particular, of criminal prosecutors in holding bosses to account: a development that is, at best, a mixed blessing. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, passed in haste following the Enron and WorldCom scandals, is imposing heavy costs on American companies; whether these are exceeded by any benefits is the subject of fierce debate and may not be known for years.
Eliot Spitzer, New York’s attorney-general, is the leading advocate and practitioner of an energetic "law enforcement" approach. He may be right that the recent burst of punitive actions has been good for the economy, even if some of his own decisions have been open to question. Where he is undoubtedly right is in arguing that corporate America has done a lamentable job of governing itself. As he says in an article in the Wall Street Journal this week, "The honour code among CEOs didn’t work. Board oversight didn’t work. Self-regulation was a complete failure." AIG’s board, for example, did nothing about Mr. Greenberg’s use of murky accounting, or the conflicts posed by his use of offshore vehicles, or his constant bullying of his critics let alone the firm’s alleged participation in bid rigging--until Mr. Spitzer threatened a criminal prosecution that might have destroyed the firm.What is the main idea of the passage()
A.America's bosses no longer have absolute power.
B.The conviction of last month on fraud.charges.
C.The crisis in American corporate governance.
D.Deceptive appearances of the America's celebrity bosses.
正确答案
A
解析
主旨题。文章开头提到了五位美国大老板被夺权的厄运,接着得出这样一个结论“20世纪90年代末那种失调的法人权得到了纠正,当时的大老板像君主那样拥有绝对的权力”,然后又用若干例证加以详述。因此正确答案应为[A]“美国老板们不再拥有绝对的权力”。[B]“上个月关于诈骗收费的指控”,[C]“美国公司管理的危机”和 [D]“美国知名老板的欺骗性外表”都不符合本文的主旨。
It has been a wretched few weeks for America’s celebrity bosses. AIG’s Maurice Greenberg has been dramatically ousted from the firm through which he dominated global insurance for decades. At Morgan Stanley a mutiny is forcing Philip Purcell, a boss used to getting his own way, into an increasingly desperate campaign to save his skin. At Boeing, Harry Stonecipher was called out of retirement to lead the scandal-hit firm and raise ethical standards, only to commit a lapse of his own, being sacked for sending e-mails to a lover who was also an employee. Carly Fiorina was the most powerful woman in corporate America until a few weeks ago, when Hewlett-Packard (HP) sacked her for poor performance. The fate of Bernie Ebbers is much grimmer. The once high-profile boss of WorldCom could well spend the rest of his life behind bars following his conviction last month on fraud charges.
In different ways, each of these examples appears to point to the same, welcome conclusion: that the imbalance in corporate power of the late 1990s, when many bosses were allowed to behave like absolute monarchs, has been corrected. Alas, appearances can be deceptive. While each of these recent tales of chief-executive woe is a sign of progress, none provides much evidence that the crisis in American corporate governance is yet over. In fact, each of these cases is an example of failed, not successful, governance.
At the very least, the boards of both Morgan Stanley and HP were far too slow to address their bosses’ inadequacies. The record of the Boeing board in picking chiefs prone to ethical lapses is too long to be dismissed as mere bad luck. The fall of Messrs Greenberg and Ebbers, meanwhile, highlights the growing role of government--and, in particular, of criminal prosecutors in holding bosses to account: a development that is, at best, a mixed blessing. The Sarbanes-Oxley act, passed in haste following the Enron and WorldCom scandals, is imposing heavy costs on American companies; whether these are exceeded by any benefits is the subject of fierce debate and may not be known for years.
Eliot Spitzer, New York’s attorney-general, is the leading advocate and practitioner of an energetic "law enforcement" approach. He may be right that the recent burst of punitive actions has been good for the economy, even if some of his own decisions have been open to question. Where he is undoubtedly right is in arguing that corporate America has done a lamentable job of governing itself. As he says in an article in the Wall Street Journal this week, "The honour code among CEOs didn’t work. Board oversight didn’t work. Self-regulation was a complete failure." AIG’s board, for example, did nothing about Mr. Greenberg’s use of murky accounting, or the conflicts posed by his use of offshore vehicles, or his constant bullying of his critics let alone the firm’s alleged participation in bid rigging--until Mr. Spitzer threatened a criminal prosecution that might have destroyed the firm.What does the phrase "a mixed blessing" (Line 6, Paragraph 3) mean()
A.All kinds of good things.
B.Something mixed with confusions.
C.Something both good and bad.
D.Something mixed with optimistic and pessimistic results.
正确答案
C
解析
语义题。文章第三段第三句提到“Messrs Greenberg和Ebbers的倒台强调了政府不断提高的作用——尤其是罪犯检举人——在限制老板解释方面:一种最多是 a mixed blessing的发展”,从而可以看出,既有大公司老板的倒台,又有强调政府功能的作用,所以[C]“好坏参半之事”最能体现该短语在文中的意思。[A]“各种好事”,[B]“掺有困扰之事”和[D]“掺有乐观和悲观后果之事”都不符合文中表达的意思。
下述不符合血细胞发育过程中形态演变规律的是
A.胞体由大至小
B.胞浆量由多至少
C.颗粒从无至有
D.核仁从有至无
E.核染色质由细致至粗糙
正确答案
B
解析
暂无解析
下列有关我国古代四大发明的表述,正确的是______
A.西汉时期蔡伦改进了造纸术
B.隋唐时期已经有了活字印刷的书籍
C.唐朝时发明了管形火器“突火枪”
D.宋代在航海交通上已普遍使用指南针
正确答案
D
解析
[解析] 本题中改进造纸术的是东汉蔡伦,隋唐时的印刷技术属于雕版印刷,管形火器“突火枪”是在南宋发明的,A、B、C三项都不正确,故正确答案为D。
( )强调规章至上,凡事循规蹈矩,要求员工有章可守,有法可依。企业强调组织结构的正规化,企业管理追求稳定性和持久性。
A.家族式企业文化B.发展式企业文化C.市场式企业文化D.官僚式企业文化
正确答案
D
解析
暂无解析
扫码查看完整答案与解析